Search this site:
OgreCave Audio Report: fear the podcast!

Recent Reviews
Goblin Grapple
(Silver Gaming Co.)
Brothers
(505 Games)
Pathfinder Card Game
(Paizo Publishing)
Cthulhu Invictus Companion
(Chaosium)
Boss Monster!
(Brotherwise Games)
Murder of Crows
(Atlas Games)
More...

Features
Christmas Gift Guide 2010 (11/26/10)
PAX East 2010 report (4/9/10)
Christmas Gift Guide 2009 (12/4/09)
Games of the Ninja 2008 (12/5/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2008 (11/27/08)
Screams from the Cave 2008
(11/7/08)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2008 (9/12/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2007 (11/30/07)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2007 (8/17/07)
GAMA Trade Show 2007 report (4/27/07)
Christmas Gift Guide 2006 (11/30/06)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2006 (7/28/06)
Christmas Gift Guide 2005 (11/29/05)
Christmas Gift Guide 2004 (12/10/04)
Night of the Living Gamer
(Halloween RPGs)
(10/22/04)
More...

About OgreCave & staff

Join the OgreCave team

Syndicate us on your site

Interviews
Randy Angle - Gruesome Ghoulies (9/28/20)
James Wallis - Alas Vegas (2/13/13)
Gareth Hanrahan - The Laundry RPG (5/17/10)
Jamie Chambers - Signal Fire Studios (7/21/09)
Darren Watts - Hero Games (5/4/09)
Stan! (11/7/08)
Brendan LaSalle - Pandahead Productions (audio; 9/28/07)
Richard Garfield (10/12/04)
More...


Star Wars PocketModel CCG rules are online: definitely the most 3D card game ever, or something
 

« WotC games patents, patents game | Main | Spiel des Jahres nominees for 2007 announced »

May 23, 2007
04:01 PM: misuba says...
Star Wars PocketModel CCG rules are online: definitely the most 3D card game ever, or something

Here's the lo-res PDF of the rules (still not necessarily something you wanna choke down if you're on dialup). I'm classifying this one in "Card Games" now because there appears to be no component of miniatures or positional play, or indeed any gameplay-based reason for the models to exist at all. Hey, at least this one gets around the patent!


Comments

May 25, 2007 08:34 AM: Lee Valentine says...

I disagree with your assessment of the models not being used in game play. There are three zones of play plus a characters reserve fleet, so there is some positionality, although it is positionality as one thinks of in checkers as opposed to a typical war game. Also, damage is assigned on a ship-by-ship basis.

Now arguably the models could have been replaced by cards featuring the ships, and perhaps that was your point. But by that logic, lots of wargames could be turned into Battleground by YMG.

I never got a chance to demo this at GTS, but at least based on initial impressions, the rules themselves don't seem to give a lot of tactical options. It's almost more of a resource allocation game than a wargame from the appearance of the rulebook. Perhaps like a traditional CCG, the text on the cards is the meat of the game.

May 25, 2007 09:42 AM: misuba says...

I saw the zones on the pictured playmat but didn't read anything about them in the rules... but I have to admit I was hurrying through. Thanks for checking me.

May 25, 2007 02:52 PM: Chris says...

"Perhaps like a traditional CCG, the text on the cards is the meat of the game."

Yuck.

;)

May 25, 2007 09:04 PM: Lee Valentine says...

I have terrible vision, so I don't have a clear idea of the rules. As best as I could figure out through all the fuzzy vision, there are 3 zones (your home territory, uncontrolled space, and your opponent's territories). You play Objective cards in your home territory and your reinforcements always start in your home territory. The goal of the game is to march your ships into your opponent's territory and blow up all his objective cards without letting him blow up your home territory. You can only move a ship one zone at a time, and you can only attack a defending ship with an attacker in the same zone.

May 27, 2007 02:04 PM: rich says...

Had a chance to actually play this at Celebration. It's quick to play, the ships look great, and it's deep enough to be interesting for gamers while shallow enough to be playable by non-gamers. Also, the total buy in necessary to make a standard fleet per the rules is still lower than the cost of just a starter pack of WotC's starship game, which cost you'll need to at least double if you want to build a pure force under that game's rules.

Worth a look!

May 27, 2007 05:22 PM: Dai Oni says...

Paper vs. Plastic. I dunno.

Hope someone else files a patent based on their game. >:)

May 27, 2007 06:30 PM: misuba says...

"Paper?? Plastic?? Fools! My Star Wars collectible game is based on delicious, renewable CORN SOLIDS!"

May 28, 2007 07:37 AM: Corphus says...

Now there's an idea! An edible collectible game! Whenever one of your pieces is destroyed, you or your opponent can eat it (kind of like Iron Man Magic, where you physically destroy your cards). Think of the re-buy potential! "That Elven Archer worked out great and was so delicious... I must find more. What do you mean it's rare?!"

Of course you'd have to deal with spoilage issues and potential weight gain in your target audience. And singles on eBay are probably a shaky prospect. Not to mention the potential for poison in organized play...

June 11, 2007 04:42 PM: paracetamol says...

Good site. Thank you!!!
paracetamol

Post A Comment
Name:


Email Address:


Comments:


Remember info?




 
Back home, or browse the archives
  Powered by Movable Type 2.661

Site copyright 2001 Allan Sugarbaker. Trademarks and copyrights mentioned on this page owned by their respective owners.