Search this site:
OgreCave Audio Report: fear the podcast!

Recent Reviews
Goblin Grapple
(Silver Gaming Co.)
Brothers
(505 Games)
Pathfinder Card Game
(Paizo Publishing)
Cthulhu Invictus Companion
(Chaosium)
Boss Monster!
(Brotherwise Games)
Murder of Crows
(Atlas Games)
More...

Features
Christmas Gift Guide 2010 (11/26/10)
PAX East 2010 report (4/9/10)
Christmas Gift Guide 2009 (12/4/09)
Games of the Ninja 2008 (12/5/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2008 (11/27/08)
Screams from the Cave 2008
(11/7/08)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2008 (9/12/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2007 (11/30/07)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2007 (8/17/07)
GAMA Trade Show 2007 report (4/27/07)
Christmas Gift Guide 2006 (11/30/06)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2006 (7/28/06)
Christmas Gift Guide 2005 (11/29/05)
Christmas Gift Guide 2004 (12/10/04)
Night of the Living Gamer
(Halloween RPGs)
(10/22/04)
More...

About OgreCave & staff

Join the OgreCave team

Syndicate us on your site

Interviews
Randy Angle - Gruesome Ghoulies (9/28/20)
James Wallis - Alas Vegas (2/13/13)
Gareth Hanrahan - The Laundry RPG (5/17/10)
Jamie Chambers - Signal Fire Studios (7/21/09)
Darren Watts - Hero Games (5/4/09)
Stan! (11/7/08)
Brendan LaSalle - Pandahead Productions (audio; 9/28/07)
Richard Garfield (10/12/04)
More...


Deathknell heard, loud & clear
 

« Privateer on business, book pricing, time, and money | Main | GOTHIKA: Invisible Expansion Set - no, I didn't typo that »

March 25, 2005
11:12 PM: Allan Sugarbaker says...
Deathknell heard, loud & clear

Today marks the release of the latest D&D Miniatures expansion, Deathknell. Chock full of unholy walking dead (as seen in the numerous preview articles on the WotC site), the boosters for this set changed the rarity distribution of the figures. Now in each new salvo of minis gamers buy, there's one less uncommon figure, replaced by a common. Time will tell if players get annoyed by the change, or if they appreciate the larger horde of For those who want to drool before purchasing, be sure to stop by the Deathknell gallery WotC put up.


Comments

March 26, 2005 05:43 PM: mearls says...

The change looks like it could work, but I think WotC needs to do a better job of picking out the commons. For Deathknell, the commons included a deathlock (sort of a junior lich) and a goblin adept. I'd rather have those as uncommons, since they're more likely to serve as boss monsters than grunts.

OTOH, it's great to buy a case or two and get lots of grunt figures, like the orc savages, kenku sneaks, and bullywugs from this set.

The other useful part of this change is that they can afford to push more good-aligned figures into the uncommon slots without cutting down on the raw numbers of figures for each faction.

March 27, 2005 06:25 PM: wraith428 says...

Okay if I remember correctly it used to be:

1 rare
2 uncommon
5 common

Am I wrong. The change would imply:

1 rare
1 uncommon
6 common

Doesn't that make uncommons the same as rares. Or am I mistaken and was it 1/3/4

Post A Comment
Name:


Email Address:


Comments:


Remember info?




 
Back home, or browse the archives
  Powered by Movable Type 2.661

Site copyright 2001 Allan Sugarbaker. Trademarks and copyrights mentioned on this page owned by their respective owners.