Search this site:
OgreCave Audio Report: fear the podcast!

Recent Reviews
Goblin Grapple
(Silver Gaming Co.)
Brothers
(505 Games)
Pathfinder Card Game
(Paizo Publishing)
Cthulhu Invictus Companion
(Chaosium)
Boss Monster!
(Brotherwise Games)
Murder of Crows
(Atlas Games)
More...

Features
Christmas Gift Guide 2010 (11/26/10)
PAX East 2010 report (4/9/10)
Christmas Gift Guide 2009 (12/4/09)
Games of the Ninja 2008 (12/5/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2008 (11/27/08)
Screams from the Cave 2008
(11/7/08)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2008 (9/12/08)
Christmas Gift Guide 2007 (11/30/07)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2007 (8/17/07)
GAMA Trade Show 2007 report (4/27/07)
Christmas Gift Guide 2006 (11/30/06)
Ogres' Choice Awards 2006 (7/28/06)
Christmas Gift Guide 2005 (11/29/05)
Christmas Gift Guide 2004 (12/10/04)
Night of the Living Gamer
(Halloween RPGs)
(10/22/04)
More...

About OgreCave & staff

Join the OgreCave team

Syndicate us on your site

Interviews
Randy Angle - Gruesome Ghoulies (9/28/20)
James Wallis - Alas Vegas (2/13/13)
Gareth Hanrahan - The Laundry RPG (5/17/10)
Jamie Chambers - Signal Fire Studios (7/21/09)
Darren Watts - Hero Games (5/4/09)
Stan! (11/7/08)
Brendan LaSalle - Pandahead Productions (audio; 9/28/07)
Richard Garfield (10/12/04)
More...


Marvel's case against City of Heroes falling apart
 

« It's not the size, it's how you delve it | Main | Eden announces tabletop RPG based on City of Heroes »

March 11, 2005
08:43 PM: Allan Sugarbaker says...
Marvel's case against City of Heroes falling apart

It looks as though City of Heroes has an excellent chance of emerging from Marvel's copyright infringement lawsuit unscathed, due to today's announcement of several charges against NCSoft and Cryptic Studios being dismissed. Agreeing with the defendants' assertion that many of Marvel's exhibits were "false and sham," the judge pulled the plug on more than half of Marvel's claims. NCSoft and Cryptic have ten days to respond to the rest of the case's claims, and file any counterclaims. Not quite a resounding "Bad Spidey! No biscuit!" But the comic book giant may soon see the rest of its frivolous case go down in flames.


Comments

March 12, 2005 09:08 AM: WilliamG says...

what exactly made Marvel think it could get away with this? Have they won similar lawsuits in the past? Seems like the whole thing was a fool's errand.

March 12, 2005 10:39 AM: Mr.BobDobolina says...

If they win, they lock down a chance to come up with their own MMORPG and get in on the action. If they lose, in the interim they may negotiate a little piece of the action for themselves in one way or another (like a settlement or a licensing fee). It's not bad for their business because the amont of folks that might boycott their books because of the suit is negligable.

March 12, 2005 01:52 PM: Dai Oni says...

Perhaps Marvel shouldn't go into MMORPG in the first place. Only mindless drones are willing to pay-2-play.

March 13, 2005 09:40 AM: Chris says...

Mindless Drones? Ummm.....

March 13, 2005 04:10 PM: Dai Oni says...

Better "mindless drone" than "EverCrack addicts" (does not only apply toward hardco-... err, dedicated EQ online gamers). ;-)

March 14, 2005 06:31 AM: Anonymous says...

Well, one big thing Marvel seemed t hope was that NCSoft would throw so much money at keeping Marvel off its back that CoH would suffer and Marvel's MMORPG would have no competition... which doesn't say much for Marvel's game.

Post A Comment
Name:


Email Address:


Comments:


Remember info?




 
Back home, or browse the archives
  Powered by Movable Type 2.661

Site copyright 2001 Allan Sugarbaker. Trademarks and copyrights mentioned on this page owned by their respective owners.